Meghana Bhange
I work at the intersection of machine learning, privacy, and social impact, where my research focuses on Algorithmic Collective Action (ACA) and Protective Optimisation Technologies (POTs) to allow communities to resist algorithmic harm and regain agency in these systems.
About / Research
My current research investigates Algorithmic Collective Action (ACA) (Hardt et al., 2023) and Protective Optimisation Technologies (POTs) (Kulynych et al., 2020) to understand how communities can feel empowered to resist harm that occur in algorithmic system and reclaim agency. The main research objective of this work is to investigate POTs (external user-driven interventions) as mechanisms that allow individuals and communities to contest harmful model decisions, opt out of algorithmic systems, modify the algorithmic decision, and get recourse in algorithmic decision-making systems, with the aim of mitigating algorithmic harms.
I pursue this direction as a PhD researcher under the co-supervision of Prof. Ulrich Aïvodji and Prof. Elliot Creager. I am currently affiliated with the Trustworthy Information Systems Lab (TISL) and Mila — Québec AI Institute as a Student Researcher.
I completed my Master’s in Information Technology Engineering at ÉTS Montréal. My thesis focused on building privacy-preserving infrastructure for collective complaint systems, co-supervised by Prof. Aïvodji and Prof. Jean-Marc Robert.
Previously, I worked as a Machine Learning Engineer and still consult via Toptal, contributing to NLP-driven projects like inclusive hiring pipelines (SpaCy, GPT-3, FastAPI) and an automated trading platform integrating technical-indicator strategies.
Algorithmic systems are routinely used to make high-stake decisions in a lot of different areas. As these systems are situated in the sociotechnical intersection, they are also prone to introduce harms for users interacting with these systems. Algorithmic harms (Shelby et al., 2023) can occur in various ways in AI driven systems such as perpetuating unjust hierarchies or even lead do uneven distribution of resources. Hence, this creates need for techniques and methods to allow users to mitigate these harms. While algorithmic fairness techniques have been widely proposed, traditional algorithmic fairness techniques assume that platforms are responsible for ensuring that the models are fair, while users receive these fair outcomes or explanations that systems provide. This provider-centric model of accountability limits attention to harms that can be fixed within existing optimization systems and assumes the cooperation of those who control them. Platforms could also manipulate metrics to make them appear more fair than they actually are. Thus, it is important to study methods in which users or communities can intervene in these systems externally to make the AI more aligned with their needs, accountable to those affected, and resilient against harmful optimization dynamics.
Research Interests
Selected Publications
Pre-prints & Workshop Papers
meghana.history
Let's connect.
Open to collaborations on algorithmic collective action, privacy-preserving ML, and socio-technical systems. Always happy to chat.